Re: pg_amcheck contrib application

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date: 2021-03-13 05:09:21
Message-ID: 0F3B276E-E809-4531-957A-53B6AC0628C1@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mar 12, 2021, at 9:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>> Don't almost all of the following tests have the same issue?
>
> Ah, nevermind, I was looking at an older version of 003_check.pl.
> I concur that 24189277f missed only one here.
>
> Pushed your fix.
>
> regards, tom lane

Thanks! Was just responding to your other email, but now I don't have to send it.

Sorry for painting so many farm animals red this evening.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-03-13 05:17:57 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-03-13 05:08:13 Re: pg_amcheck contrib application