| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two small patches for the isolationtester lexer |
| Date: | 2018-03-01 01:00:56 |
| Message-ID: | 0E806A3B-1FA2-4D18-99DA-80091B910F2F@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 01 Mar 2018, at 06:01, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> I agree, patch 0002 was broken and the correct fix is a much bigger project -
>> one too big for me to tackle right now (but hopefully at some point in the near
>> future). Thanks for the review of it though!
>
> OK. I'm going to mark this commitfest entry closed, since the other patch
> is in and this one needs a good bit more work. Please start a new thread,
> or at least a new CF entry, if you do more work in this area.
I absolutely agree, thanks!
cheers ./daniel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-01 01:03:30 | Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2018-03-01 01:00:54 | Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. |