Re: new environment variable INITDB_LOCALE_PROVIDER

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new environment variable INITDB_LOCALE_PROVIDER
Date: 2025-10-10 09:32:08
Message-ID: 0E7950BD-78E4-4B47-ACFC-7CD81F26BAEA@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am 09.10.2025 um 06:27 schrieb Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
>
> On Tue, 2025-07-29 at 16:55 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> $SUBJECT makes it easier to test other providers, especially the
>> regression tests.
>
> Rebased.
>
> Changes:
>
> * Use environment variable name PG_LOCALE_PROVIDER, which seems more
> consistent.

Is this not something that could already be done using PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-10-10 10:29:07 Re: [PATCH TEST] Fix logical replication setup in subscription test `t/009_matviews.pl`
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-10-10 09:26:50 Re: speedup COPY TO for partitioned table.