| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
| Date: | 2022-04-04 18:32:40 |
| Message-ID: | 0D70E552-FD9E-4ABF-9357-84AF97143602@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Apr 4, 2022, at 10:44 AM, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm writing a parallel test just for this. Will get back to you.
Ok, that experiment didn't accomplish anything, beyond refreshing my memory regarding Cluster.pm preferring sockets over ports.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-04 19:01:15 | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-04 18:31:24 | Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress.pl? |