Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Date: 2025-09-17 11:07:56
Message-ID: 0D5DCA1E-608D-46D3-9AB6-3CBE54987596@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 17 Sep 2025, at 12:58, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Yes, clearly we need to fix the description we have now. However, we
> have already updated this item twice, so I think we need to be careful
> to get it right this time:

Maybe we should move to a model where the release notes are worked on as a
normal docs patch on the list and only committed at around RC1 to keep us from
changing and removing from (in case of reverts) documentation published on
postgresql.org?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-09-17 11:19:31 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2025-09-17 10:59:47 Re: Proposal to allow DELETE/UPDATE on partitioned tables with unsupported foreign partitions