| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo? |
| Date: | 2026-02-24 03:11:08 |
| Message-ID: | 0CBD1035-6278-40B5-8DB2-A947F6EC6CB7@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Feb 16, 2026, at 11:39, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
> guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
> fine.
>
> BEFORE
> These binary files are found with the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
> the data directory...
>
> SUGGESTION
> These binary files are found in the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
> the data directory...
>
>
> PSA patch for the same.
>
> ======
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia.
> <v1-0001-DOCS-pg_walsummary-fix-typo.patch>
I would guess “with” was a typo of “within”. I agree with changing “with” to “in”, alternatively, “within” and “under” may also work there.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tender Wang | 2026-02-24 03:12:20 | Re: MERGE behavior with REPEATABLE READ isolation level |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-02-24 03:00:23 | Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging |