Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?
Date: 2026-02-24 03:11:08
Message-ID: 0CBD1035-6278-40B5-8DB2-A947F6EC6CB7@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Feb 16, 2026, at 11:39, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
> guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
> fine.
>
> BEFORE
> These binary files are found with the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
> the data directory...
>
> SUGGESTION
> These binary files are found in the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
> the data directory...
>
>
> PSA patch for the same.
>
> ======
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia.
> <v1-0001-DOCS-pg_walsummary-fix-typo.patch>

I would guess “with” was a typo of “within”. I agree with changing “with” to “in”, alternatively, “within” and “under” may also work there.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tender Wang 2026-02-24 03:12:20 Re: MERGE behavior with REPEATABLE READ isolation level
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-02-24 03:00:23 Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging