Re: latest hstore patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: latest hstore patch
Date: 2009-10-02 17:34:29
Message-ID: 0C5B4DAA-5E65-4EB5-8819-4C6A60C6280C@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>> The point is it's *not* solved in the context of using pg_migrator.
>
> Yes, that's my point too, against David's argument that "surely
> someone
> must have solved it". What we have here is a new problem, so it's not
> so clear that there's any solution at all (yet).

Yeah, I didn't mean that someone must've solved it for PostgreSQL, but
that this sort of problem must have been solved before, wherever
binary data storage is an issue.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Rowell 2009-10-02 17:46:10 LIMIT 1 == EXISTS optimization?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-02 17:11:31 Inappropriate failure conditions in foreign_data regression test