> On 9 Mar 2021, at 04:26, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> It looks like it is not that much a good idea to define it as a debug
> option after all. So I guess that the attached would fix the failure,
> where FDW servers can still pass down the parameter at will for
> backward-compatibility, and where libpq keeps ignoring its value. Any
> thoughts?
While not pretty, I think that might be the least invasive option right now.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/