| From: | Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Campbell <chris(at)bignerdranch(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Date: | 2006-02-03 17:43:38 |
| Message-ID: | 0C302E10-608C-4233-94DE-91C0F85FE7AB@alpinenetworking.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Chris Campbell wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 08:05, Mark Woodward wrote:
>
>> Using the "/etc/hosts" file or DNS to maintain host locations for
>> is a
>> fairly common and well known practice, but there is no such
>> mechanism for
>> "ports." The problem now becomes a code issue, not a system
>> administration
>> issue.
>
> What if you assigned multiple IPs to a machine, then used ipfw (or
> something) to forward connections to port 5432 for each IP to the
> proper IP and port?
If he had multiple ips couldn't he just make them all listen only on
one specific ip (instead of '*') and just use the default port?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Campbell | 2006-02-03 17:44:00 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-03 17:27:26 | Re: Passing arguments to views |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Campbell | 2006-02-03 17:44:00 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Previous Message | Andrew Klosterman | 2006-02-03 16:15:41 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql |