Re: PRIMARY KEYS

From: Mark Wilson <mwilson13(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PRIMARY KEYS
Date: 2003-05-22 20:50:37
Message-ID: 0A80F29B-8C97-11D7-B6C3-000393876156@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 11:43 AM, wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com wrote:

>
> Choosing an artificial key is the ideal, according to everything I've
> heard. In one of my database classes, I remember I had a classmate who
> had
> worked with some very large datasets of U.S. citizens, and found that
> there
> were actually duplicate social security numbers assigned to different
> people. Not many, and I don't recall whether the first person had died
> before the SSN was reused, but it really goes to show that they only to
> _guarantee_ a unique primary key is to generate it yourself. Yes, you
> may
> want to put a unique index on your SSN field or other candidate key
> fields
> that ought to be unique.
>
> [snip]

Wouldn't one wish to know, and deal with, a situation where a business
rule -- each person has a unique social security number -- has been
violated? If you're a business doing tax withholding for employees,
isn't this a critical question?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-22 21:16:41 Re: ERROR: Memory exhausted in AllocSetAlloc(188)
Previous Message Corey W. Gibbs 2003-05-22 20:49:19 ILIKE Problem?