RE: speeding up planning with partitions

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Langote' <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-02-08 07:43:02
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FB9667D@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Amit Langote [mailto:Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 3:52 PM
> Hmm, I had rebased v20 over HEAD as of yesterday evening. CF bot seemed
> to be happy with it too:
>
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/amit-langote.html
>
> Also, I rebased the patches again on the latest HEAD as of this morning
> and there were no issues.

There seem to have been some modifications between the latest snapshot tarball and HEAD. I've just managed to apply your v20 to HEAD. Thanks.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-02-08 08:16:21 Set fallback_application_name for a walreceiver to cluster_name
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-02-08 07:36:09 Re: libpq compression