RE: speeding up planning with partitions

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Langote' <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-02-08 06:40:39
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FB965DB@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit,

I'm afraid v20-0001 fails to apply to the current HEAD (precisely, Could you check it?

I'm trying to reproduce what Imai-san hit with my patch. His environment is master(at)Jan/28 + v18 of your patches. When he added my patch there, CREATE TABLE crashed.

On the other hand, the current master + my patch succeeds. So, I wanted to test with the current HEAD + v20 of your patch + my patch.

Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2019-02-08 06:48:32 ON SELECT rule on a table without columns
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-02-08 05:31:46 Re: Allow some recovery parameters to be changed with reload