RE: speeding up planning with partitions

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'David Rowley' <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-02-08 01:50:40
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FB95FD0@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: David Rowley [mailto:david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com]
> It's good to see work being done to try and improve this, but I think
> it's best to do it on another thread. I think there was some agreement
> upthread about this not being Amit's patch's problem. Doing it here
> will make keeping track of this more complex than it needs to be.
> There's also Amit's issue of keeping his patch series up to date. The
> CFbot is really useful to alert patch authors when that's required,
> but having other patches posted to the same thread can cause the CFbot
> to check the wrong patch.

OK, you're right. I'll continue this on another thread.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-02-08 02:29:27 Re: dsa_allocate() faliure
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-02-08 01:45:16 Re: speeding up planning with partitions