Re: [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32 function names from error messages?

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Michael Paquier' <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32 function names from error messages?
Date: 2017-02-06 06:31:45
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F699D4F@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> I find it hard to have an opinion on the matter as a non-translator.
> Why not asking translators directly on pgsql-translators?
>

I didn't think of pgsql-translators. I'll ask the same question there. Thanks.

Anyway, this is also a matter of source code style, and those who commit the code live here, so I think I need to hear opinions here, too.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-02-06 06:33:04 Re: [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32 function names from error messages?
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-02-06 06:30:13 Re: 0/NULL/NIL assignments in build_*_rel()