Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Ashutosh Bapat' <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date: 2016-10-28 01:45:07
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F638A0E@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Ashutosh Bapat [mailto:ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com]
> Ok. In that case, I think we shouldn't even call PG_SETMASK() similar to
> pgarch_exit(). Attached patch removes PG_SETMASK(). Let me know if it looks
> good.

It looks good. Thanks.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-10-28 01:56:53 move collation import to backend
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-28 01:25:28 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.