Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Andres Freund' <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows
Date: 2016-10-11 02:36:06
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5F9E54@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Thomas Munro [mailto:thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com]
> Your ~2.4% number is similar to what was reported for Linux with 4GB
> shared_buffers:

I'm relieved to know that a similar figure was gained on Linux. Thanks for the info.

> Later in that thread there was a report of a dramatic ~15% increase in "best
> result" TPS, but that was with 60GB of shared_buffers on a machine with
> 256GB of RAM:
> org

From: Andres Freund [mailto:andres(at)anarazel(dot)de]
> FWIW, I've seen 2-3x increases with ~60GB of s_b.

Wow, nice figures. It's unfortunate that I don't have such a big machine available at hand.

Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-10-11 03:30:49 Re: "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2016-10-11 02:29:31 Re: Macro customizable hashtable / bitmapscan & aggregation perf