From: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Could pgsql jdbc support pool reauthentication? |
Date: | 2017-10-31 09:08:10 |
Message-ID: | 09a677fd-144f-6b16-57a8-ed6a18f3ff08@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hello Vladimir, thanx
On 31/10/2017 10:30, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> Achilleas>So if say we need 5 connections max for the most complex app to work, and we have 200 users, then at peak time, the total number of connections would have to be raised to 1000.
>
> Pools can shrink, so you do not have to raise total number of connections to 1000 unless you truly expect 1000 concurrent connections.
I know, but we still risk having our max_connections exceeded. And this is not scaleable.
>
> That is, you could configure 200 pools with minCapacity=0, maxCapacity=5.
> Of course you would need thread-pool limits as well to avoid sending more than 5 concurrent requests on behalf of a given user id.
>
That's what he have done.
> Technically speaking, there's JDBC standard way of calling "set_user" via java.sql.Connection#setClientInfo("ClientUser", java.lang.String), however I'm not sure how well it is supported/used.
>
>
> PS Are you aware of ApplicationName? That is java.sql.Connection#setClientInfo("ApplicationName", java.lang.String)
Yes, we make heavy use of ApplicationName in each of our apps/tenants. Pretty handy with logging, pgbadger etc.
>
> Vladimir
--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2017-10-31 09:20:14 | Re: Could pgsql jdbc support pool reauthentication? |
Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2017-10-31 08:30:11 | Re: Could pgsql jdbc support pool reauthentication? |