Re: Change the bool member of the Query structure to bits

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang(at)yeah(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Change the bool member of the Query structure to bits
Date: 2024-02-20 11:18:46
Message-ID: 099cc1b8-c4bd-486a-876d-35c187ee4a1d@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/20/24 11:11, Quan Zongliang wrote:
>
> Sorry. I forgot to save a file. This is the latest.
>
> On 2024/2/20 18:07, Quan Zongliang wrote:
>>
>> The Query structure has an increasing number of bool attributes. This
>> is likely to increase in the future. And they have the same
>> properties. Wouldn't it be better to store them in bits? Common
>> statements don't use them, so they have little impact. This also saves
>> memory space.
>>

Hi,

Are we really adding bools to Query that often? A bit of git-blame says
it's usually multiple years to add a single new flag, which is what I'd
expect. I doubt that'll change.

As for the memory savings, can you quantify how much memory this would save?

I highly doubt that's actually true (or at least measurable). The Query
struct has ~256B, the patch cuts that to ~232B. But we allocate stuff in
power-of-2, so we'll allocate 256B chunk anyway. And we allocate very
few of those objects anyway ...

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-02-20 11:18:57 Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2024-02-20 11:17:07 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes