Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute
Date: 2023-03-22 09:42:00
Message-ID: 097d7b0b-5e38-719d-9b5c-13e7497d8c0b@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.03.23 18:46, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I think we should consider getting rid of attcacheoff. I doubt it's
> worth its weight these days, because deforming via slots starts at the
> beginning anyway. The overhead of maintaining it is not insubstantial, and
> it's just architecturally ugly to to update tupledescs continually.

Btw., could attcacheoff be int16?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-03-22 09:44:55 Re: Bytea PL/Perl transform
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-03-22 09:39:25 Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!