Re: strange behaviour of psql \e command

From: Neil Tiffin <neilt(at)neiltiffin(dot)com>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of psql \e command
Date: 2016-01-01 18:23:50
Message-ID: 0956AB69-5714-4C6C-9C71-02D2EDF089FD@neiltiffin.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On Jan 1, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I noticed, that psql's \e command doesn't worked for me complaining 'error
>> opening file'. I did research and found that following setting in joe's (if
>> I choose editor as joe) configuraton causes the problem:
>> -exask ^KX always confirms file name
>> That worked for decades :), so I'm wondering what was changed either in El
>> Capitan or psql code ?
>
> I don't recall that we've changed anything much at all about \e recently,
> so probably the way to bet is that the El Capitan update broke something
> :-(. Can anyone else confirm?
>

Seems to work fine for me with vi on OS X 10.11.2 (15C50) and VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Oct 27 2015 16:22:14) Compiled by root(at)apple(dot)com

Nell

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-01-01 19:06:06 Re: Keyword classifications
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-01 17:14:11 Re: strange behaviour of psql \e command