Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Date: 2003-06-16 05:18:36
Message-ID: 092601c333c6$bef6eaa0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general


> all very good points. And I felt a little bit of bile in my mouth, myself,
when I realized, several years ago, the true development and business model
behind MySQL. Also, the HODGEPODGE way they added features from other
development projects.

Yeah, but keep in your mind the somewhat hodgepodge nature of PostgreSQL
(eg. foreign keys, inheritance, etc...)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-16 05:51:24 Re: Initial draft for our "Code of Ethics and Conduct"
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-16 05:13:43 Re: PostgreSQL presentation at LSM

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2003-06-16 05:45:57 Re: full featured alter table?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-06-16 03:50:31 news server back online ... uni-directional