| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Borodin <amborodin(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_background contrib module proposal |
| Date: | 2016-12-22 21:41:15 |
| Message-ID: | 091c037a-3210-2898-5449-e3176885290a@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/22/16 4:20 AM, amul sul wrote:
> • pg_background_detach : This API takes the process id and detach the
> background process. Stored worker's session is not dropped until this
> called.
When I hear "detach" I think that whatever I'm detaching from is going
to stick around, which I don't think is the case here, right? I'd
suggest pg_background_close() instead.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-12-22 22:12:18 | Re: [BUG?] pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands() error with ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-12-22 21:33:52 | Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files |