| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enable data checksums by default |
| Date: | 2025-07-31 19:22:47 |
| Message-ID: | 08d186c06e82ecd0326ba5a67fa35bc19b607a6e.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 09:39 -0400, Greg Burd wrote:
> I agree that enabling checksums by default is the sane default. Databases
> should always make a best effort for data integrity, checksums are a
> positive step in that direction.
Having checksums on does not improve data integrity...
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-07-31 19:28:18 | Re: Enable data checksums by default |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-07-31 19:21:52 | Re: Enable data checksums by default |