Re: wrong relkind error messages

On 02.07.21 18:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> There might be room for some wordsmithing in a few places, but generally I
>> think this is complete.
>
> This looks good to me. I am +0.1 on your proposal of "cannot have
> triggers" vs Michael's "cannot create triggers", but really I could go
> with either. Michael's idea has the disadvantage that if the user fails
> to see the trailing "s" in "triggers" they could get the idea that it's
> possible to create some other trigger; that seems impossible to miss
> with your wording. But it's not that bad either.
>
> It seemed odd to me at first that errdetail_relkind_not_supported()
> returns int, but I realized that it's a trick to let you write "return
> errdetail()" so you don't have to have "break" which would require one
> extra line. Looks fine.

Thanks, committed.