RE: Fuzzy matching?

From: Jeff Eckermann <jeckermann(at)verio(dot)net>
To: "'Josh Berkus'" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Fuzzy matching?
Date: 2001-07-31 20:23:39
Message-ID: 08CD1781F85AD4118E0800A0C9B8580B094B72@NEZU
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

With version 7.2 we will have pl/perlu (untrusted), which will allow use of
the various Perl modules which do this sort of thing.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [SMTP:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:16 PM
> To: Joe Conway; Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Josh Berkus; pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Fuzzy matching?
>
> Joe,
>
> > In any case, metaphone is reportedly more accurate (at least for
> > English
> > words) than soundex, and levenshtein offers an entirely different and
> > interesting approach. Any interest in having all three of these in
> > the
> > backend?
>
> I'm quite interested, myself. How difficult is it for somebody that
> doesn't program C to attach a function from the Contrib directory? If
> it's not very difficult, then I'd recommend putting metaphone in
> /contrib, and levenstein in the backend. My reasoning is that
> levenstein is useful for all roman alphabets, but metaphone is not so
> useful for non-english versions of postgres.
>
> -Josh
>
> ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
> Josh Berkus
> Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
> for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
> and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2001-07-31 20:53:37 Re: Fuzzy matching?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-31 20:09:51 Re: Fuzzy matching?