Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

From: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date: 2016-12-28 12:37:04
Message-ID: 089d92b3-1ca8-e59d-4e29-f22874ee0676@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

27.12.2016 16:54, Alvaro Herrera:
> Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
>
>> I ran configure using following set of flags:
>> ./configure --enable-tap-tests --enable-cassert --enable-debug
>> --enable-depend CFLAGS="-O0 -g3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer"
>> And then ran make check. Here is the stacktrace:
>>
>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> #0 0x00000000006941e7 in lazy_vacuum_heap (onerel=0x1ec2360,
>> vacrelstats=0x1ef6e00) at vacuumlazy.c:1417
>> 1417 tblk =
>> ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&seg->dead_tuples[tupindex]);
> This doesn't make sense, since the patch removes the "tupindex"
> variable in that function.
>

Sorry, I didn't get what you mean.

In 0002-Vacuum-allow-using-more-than-1GB-work-mem-v3.patch

- tupindex = 0;
- while (tupindex < vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples)
+ segindex = 0;
+ tottuples = 0;
+ for (segindex = 0; segindex <= vacrelstats->dead_tuples.last_seg;
tupindex = 0, segindex++)
{

variable is still there, it was just moved to the loop.

--
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-12-28 12:48:40 Re: Reporting planning time with EXPLAIN
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-12-28 12:31:33 Re: Support for pg_receivexlog --format=plain|tar