| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Colin 't Hart <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wdavdaemon / Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux and slow Postgres recovery? |
| Date: | 2025-12-02 16:17:09 |
| Message-ID: | 085ea19f-8e97-4750-9916-104b2a0cabcc@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/2/25 06:47, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my clients has Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux installed
> on their Postgres servers.
>
> I was testing a database restore from pgBackRest. The restore itself
> seemed to complete in a reasonable amount of time, but then the Postgres
> recovery started and it was extremely slow to retrieve and apply the WAL
> files.
>
> I noticed wdavdaemon taking most of the CPU, and Postgres getting very
> little.
>
> I wonder if anyone here has any experience with configuring exclusions
> so that the WAL files can be processed faster?
>
> AND
>
> Any advice on what to communicate with their IT department about using
> this on their database servers? I've never encountered it on Linux before...
Advice, don't let any Microsoft product contact anything you care about.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Colin
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-12-02 16:26:38 | Re: Fwd: ODBC_FDW not reading Foreign Tables |
| Previous Message | Colin 't Hart | 2025-12-02 14:47:48 | wdavdaemon / Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux and slow Postgres recovery? |