From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
Date: | 2010-01-04 20:33:40 |
Message-ID: | 07CF91C1-F402-4294-BE6A-5FFA12C3B248@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> well exactly my point - that is what I think we really need and basing it upon a service we directly control is certainly easier than doing (useful) aggregation of only external services. That said we probably need both :)
Yes, because whether or not pgFoundry sticks around, lots of folks will use other stuff.
> why centralize again? if we are advocating external resources why would we bother with maintaining an even more complex mailinglist setup?
It's already centralized on pgFoundry. What's the difference?
>> The latter. Which most other project hosting sites already offer.
>
> ok but still you would have to aggregate all the stuff on those wikis back into the (hypothetical) aggregation/umbrella service ;)
No, you don't need an aggregation of Web sites. Just stuff like news or releases.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-01-04 20:41:39 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-01-04 20:30:20 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |