Re: [PATCH] Support empty ranges with bounds information

From: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mark Dilger" <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Postgres hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Isaac Morland" <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support empty ranges with bounds information
Date: 2021-03-02 20:26:50
Message-ID: 07871142-ef8a-401b-a7e2-7bb9ab16cf15@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, at 19:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> More generally, values that are visibly different yet compare equal
> are user-unfriendly in the extreme. We do have cases like that
> (IEEE-float minus zero, area-based compare of some geometric types
> come to mind) but they are all warts, not things to be emulated.

I almost agree with you, but if forced to choose,
I would rather have two wart feet I can use, rather than limping around on only one wart free foot.

/Joel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-03-02 20:39:29 Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-03-02 20:26:17 Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation