Re: Report roles in pg_upgrade pg_ prefix check

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report roles in pg_upgrade pg_ prefix check
Date: 2022-12-02 12:27:14
Message-ID: 0746F296-4C60-4B4C-817A-E48B5C6EA3CB@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 29 Nov 2022, at 00:24, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 09:58:46AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> We are a bit inconsistent in how much details we include in the report
>> textfiles, so could do that without breaking any consistency in reporting.
>> Looking at other checks, the below format would match what we already do fairly
>> well:
>>
>> <rolname> (oid=<oid>)
>>
>> Done in the attached.
>
> WFM. Thanks!

Took another look at it, and applied it. Thanks!

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-12-02 12:37:59 Re: Using AF_UNIX sockets always for tests on Windows
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-12-02 12:24:39 Re: Optimizing Node Files Support