Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement

From: "Lance Obermeyer" <LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Date: 2005-01-11 06:23:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
I hesitate to post this, since it is well travel ground, but...
This is a very black and white issue.  "PostgreSQL" is a registered trademark that I do not have a license to use. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net] 
	Sent: Mon 1/10/2005 5:33 PM 
	To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com 
	Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org 
	Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement

	Josh Berkus wrote:
	> By now, you may have seen the news announcement around Pervasive
	> starting a supported version of PostgreSQL.
	I think they should start by deciding on a spelling of their (and our)
	And then they should stop marking it as a trademark.
	Peter Eisentraut
	---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
	TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-01-11 07:20:29
Subject: Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-01-11 04:32:11
Subject: Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group