Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement

From: "Lance Obermeyer" <LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Date: 2005-01-11 06:23:11
Message-ID: 072BDB2B234F3840B0AC03411084C9AF46B3F6@ausmail2k2.aus.pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

I hesitate to post this, since it is well travel ground, but...

This is a very black and white issue. "PostgreSQL" is a registered trademark that I do not have a license to use.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
Sent: Mon 1/10/2005 5:33 PM
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement

Josh Berkus wrote:
> By now, you may have seen the news announcement around Pervasive
> starting a supported version of PostgreSQL.
> http://www.pervasivepostgres.com/

I think they should start by deciding on a spelling of their (and our)
product.

And then they should stop marking it as a trademark.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-01-11 07:20:29 Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-01-11 04:32:11 Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement