From: | Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Date: | 2016-11-09 09:52:07 |
Message-ID: | 06eb7b98-3d54-4cd1-8793-1e94a1510cd3@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> So this is really not open for negotiation. As Peter said upthread,
> what we are looking for in a CMake reimplementation is that it behaves
> exactly like the Autoconf version does. To the extent that you are unable
> or unwilling to duplicate that behavior, you increase the odds that
> we'll reject this work.
Who asking about negotiation? I just wanted an explanation for the clear
understanding and nothing more.
Now I know about reasons. Thanks.
regards
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-11-09 09:58:58 | Re: pgbench - allow backslash continuations in \set expressions |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-11-09 08:38:53 | Re: Radix tree for character conversion |