Re: pg_restore and the use of encryption

You are correct someone had rebuilt pg_dump, psql and postmaster without
encryption, but forgot to do pg_restore as they thought we would only be
using psql for restoring databases. Sorry about that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_restore and the use of encryption

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This seems very strange. Are you sure those binaries are all from the
> same release.

I don't think they could be. Our build procedure computes just one LIBS
list and uses it for all executables, so in ordinary circumstances all
the executables will have the same set of shared-library dependencies.
Certainiy pg_dump and pg_restore will, if they were built at the same
time.

regards, tom lane