Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "PgSQL Performance ML" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance
Date: 2003-08-29 01:40:18
Message-ID: 06e801c36dce$81a153b0$2800a8c0@mars
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> > As with all performance tests/benchmarks, there are probably dozens or
> > more reasons why these results aren't as accurate or wonderful as they
> > should be. Take them for what they are and hopefully everyone can
> > learn a few things from them.
> >
> > Intelligent feedback is welcome.
> >
> > http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/postgresql.php
>
> I notice that the Linux FSs weren't tested with noatime. Any
> reason?

My friend, (a FreeBSD committer), was wondering what the results are if you
turn off softupdates (to match Linux default installation) and use noatime.
He also wonders how bug the default IO is?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-08-29 01:59:50 Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance tests
Previous Message Bill Moran 2003-08-29 01:19:05 Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance