| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project |
| Date: | 2025-07-09 15:36:52 |
| Message-ID: | 06F75BCE-70DD-4F49-83D0-C035C5267634@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 9, 2025, at 11:33, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> It'd be nice if we could get there, but it'd require annotating *all*
> intentionally exported functions in the backend with PGDLLIMPORT (rather than
> just doing that for variables). Then we could make some symbols
> *intentionally* not exported, which can improve the code generation (allowing
> more compiler and linker optimizations).
How much effort would that require? Is it simply annotating all such exported functions? Or is the challenge identifying them?
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-07-09 15:51:34 | Re: Fix comment in btree_gist--1.8--1.9.sql |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-07-09 15:33:48 | Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project |