| From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dlgOperator_patch |
| Date: | 2003-09-10 02:24:26 |
| Message-ID: | 065f01c37742$a860aa00$1f324d80@w2k |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Dave.
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
(snip)
> >
> > See it, and put it though it hasn't been completed.
> > A problem is still left.
> > It takes a break because it got tired a little.:-)
>
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
> I have applied your patch, and also made some more updates to populate
> the rest of the combo boxes. I think I got it all, though I couldn't see
> where the 'supports merge' chkbox was supposed to be populated from.
Thanks.!
> This is one that is not in pga2 - any ideas?
MERGES is specified tacitly.
Default name in the preparation is put.
I don't think that it is a problem that it doesn't have chkbox.
However, are LTCMP, GTCMP necessary?
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-10 08:05:27 | Re: pgadmin3.chm in CVS |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-09-09 20:13:40 | Re: pgadmin3.chm in CVS |