Re: nested select query failing

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "amol" <amol(at)mithi(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: nested select query failing
Date: 2003-05-15 04:24:08
Message-ID: 063501c31a99$d4425020$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Please post the EXPLAIN ANALYZE of that query...

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "amol" <amol(at)mithi(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: [PERFORM] nested select query failing

> Hi everybody,
> I am new to this mailing list, so please let me know if I am not posting
> queries the way you are expecting.
>
> - We are porting a web based application from MSSQL to postgres as a
> backend.
> This is a database intensive application. I am facing a problem in some
> queries like this :
>
> select distinct attached_info.id, ownerid ,attached_info.modified_date
from
> attached_info where attached_info.id in ( select distinct
> attached_tag_list.id from attached_tag_list where attached_tag_list.id in
> select attached_info.id from attached_info where
> ttached_info.deleted='0' ) and attached_tag_list.id in ( select id from
> attached_tag_list where attached_tag = 262 ) and
> attached_tag_list.attached_tag in ( select tags.id from tags where tags.id
> in ( select tag_id from tag_classifier, tag_classifier_association where
> classifier_tag_id in ( 261, 4467, 1894, 1045, 1087, 1355, 72, 1786, 1179,
> 3090, 871, 3571, 3565, 3569, 3567, 1043, 2535, 1080, 3315, 87, 1041, 2343,
> 2345, 1869, 3088, 3872, 2651, 2923, 2302, 1681, 3636, 3964, 2778, 2694,
> 1371, 2532, 2527, 3742, 3740, 1761, 4530, 4671, 4503, 4512, 3700 ) and
> association_id='1566' and
> tag_classifier.uid=tag_classifier_association.uid ) and
> tags.isdeleted='0' ) ) order by attached_info.modified_date desc,
> attached_info.id desc;
>
> When I fire this query in psql, it does not return back.
>
> - top command shows postgres above 95+% cpu usage consistantly
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> 1550 postgres 25 0 20268 19M 18904 R 95.3 5.2 6:31 postmaster
>
> - I am using RedHat 8 with following postgres rpms
> postgresql-libs-7.2.2-1
> postgresql-7.2.2-1
> postgresql-server-7.2.2-1
>
> - RAM size is 384 MB, SWAP size is 384 MB, but top shows that memory is
free
>
> - I have done following changes after searching for performance realted
> information on the internet and postgres site
> - in /etc/rc.d/rc.local added following lines
> echo "32768" >/proc/sys/fs/file-max
> echo "98304" >/proc/sys/fs/inode-max
> - in /etc/init.d/postgresql file a pg_ctl call is changed to :
> su -l postgres -s /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/pg_ctl -D
$PGDATA -o
> '-i -N 1024 -B 2048 -d 5' -p /usr/bin/postmaster start >>
> /var/log/pgsql.log 2>&1" < /dev/null
>
> - pgsql log shows :
> ......
> }) :lefttree <> :righttree <> :extprm () :locprm () :initplan <> :nprm 0
> :scanrelid 1 } :righttree <> :extprm () :locprm () :initplan <> :nprm 0
> :keycount 3 } :righttree <> :extprm () :locprm () :initplan <> :nprm 0
> :numCols 3 :uniqColIdx 3 1 2 }
> DEBUG: ProcessQuery
> *********
> log stops here for 5/6 minuts
> *********
> DEBUG: proc_exit(0)
> DEBUG: shmem_exit(0)
> DEBUG: exit(0)
> DEBUG: reaping dead processes
> DEBUG: child process (pid 1595) exited with exit code 0
> DEBUG: proc_exit(0)
> DEBUG: shmem_exit(0)
> DEBUG: exit(0)
> DEBUG: reaping dead processes
> DEBUG: child process (pid 1598) exited with exit code 0
> DEBUG: proc_exit(0)
> DEBUG: shmem_exit(0)
> DEBUG: exit(0)
> DEBUG: reaping dead processes
> DEBUG: child process (pid 1599) exited with exit code 0
> DEBUG: proc_exit(0)
> DEBUG: shmem_exit(0)
> DEBUG: exit(0)
> DEBUG: reaping dead processes
> DEBUG: child process (pid 1600) exited with exit code 0
>
>
> - What should I do to get such queries working?
> - Is there any limit on query size?
> - Is there anything left in tuning postgres which is causing this problem
?
>
> If you want me to try anything, please let me know.
>
> thanks
> Amol
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anagha Joshi 2003-05-15 10:39:44 FW: [ADMIN] Out of disk space- error code
Previous Message amol 2003-05-15 03:57:33 nested select query failing