| From: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "daniel(at)yesql(dot)se" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |
| Date: | 2021-03-24 15:54:52 |
| Message-ID: | 05da9d530ab01e6959bd50c993d590ad73575c21.camel@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 09:28 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:05:35AM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > I can work around it temporarily for the
> > tests, but this will be a problem if any libpq clients load up multiple
> > independent databases for use with separate connections. Anyone know if
> > this is a supported use case for NSS?
>
> Are you referring to the case of threading here? This should be a
> supported case, as threads created by an application through libpq
> could perfectly use completely different connection strings.
Right, but to clarify -- I was asking if *NSS* supports loading and
using separate certificate databases as part of its API. It seems like
the internals make it possible, but I don't see the public interfaces
to actually use those internals.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2021-03-24 15:57:37 | Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-24 15:41:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |