Re: cleanup temporary files after crash

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Euler Taveira" <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Anastasia Lubennikova" <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: cleanup temporary files after crash
Date: 2021-03-18 21:44:53
Message-ID: 05d307fc-8391-4091-b279-1b3214658f10@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 6:00 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> OK. Can you prepare a patch with the proposed test approach?
> I'm on it.
What do you think about this patch?

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-crash-temp-files.patch text/x-patch 4.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-03-18 21:51:28 Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2021-03-18 21:30:36 Re: non-HOT update not looking at FSM for large tuple update