Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <eg(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?
Date: 2003-09-03 02:23:27
Message-ID: 05d101c371c2$5e120820$2800a8c0@mars
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I can hardly imagine that the backend started working with 9mb of
> memory. what did you do that PostgreSQL needed so much memory from the
> beginning??? are you using the default settings? usually the postmaster
> does not need more than 3mb at startup (in this scenario).

On FreeBSD, every one of my backends appears to occupy 20MB. That's because
the SHM is added to _each_ process.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-03 03:17:20 Re: configure error in HP-UX 11.00
Previous Message Weiping He 2003-09-03 02:20:47 Re: configure error in HP-UX 11.00