Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test
Date: 2022-09-30 17:51:29
Message-ID: 05056cfa-50d9-502d-4c4c-4725c6fb9943@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 9/30/22 2:00 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:24:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hmm, indeed. It would be more reliable to rely on the contents
>> returned by getpeereid()/getpwuid() after one successful peer
>> connection, then use it in the map. I was wondering whether using
>> stuff like getpwuid() in the perl script itself would be better, but
>> it sounds less of a headache in terms of portability to just rely on
>> authn_id via SYSTEM_USER to generate the contents of the correct map.
>
> By the way, on an extra read I have found a few things that can be
> simplified
> - I think that test_role() should be reworked so as the log patterns
> expected are passed down to connect_ok() and connect_fails() rather
> than involving find_in_log(). You still need find_in_log() to skip
> properly the case where peer is not supported by the platform, of
> course.
> - get_log_size() is not necessary. You should be able to get the same
> information with "-s $self->logfile".
> - Nit: a newline should be added at the end of 003_peer.pl.
> --

Agree that it could be simplified, thanks for the hints!

Attached a simplified version.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-peer-authentication-tap-test.patch text/plain 3.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-09-30 17:58:06 Re: Tracking last scan time
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-09-30 17:43:10 Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops