Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Index File growing big.

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>,<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index File growing big.
Date: 2003-02-27 09:03:37
Message-ID: 04d701c2de3f$1f241700$6500a8c0@fhp.internal (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
> > You should note that someone already has sent in a patch for
tablespaces, it
> > hasn't been acted on though - can't quite remember why.  Maybe we should
> > resurrect it...
> It's been awhile, but my recollection is that the patch had restricted
> functionality (which would be okay for a first cut) and it invented SQL
> syntax that seemed to lock us into that restricted functionality
> permanently (not so okay).  Details are fuzzy though...

Well, I'll resurrect it and see if it can be improved.  Tablespaces seem to
be a requested feature these days...


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: CatalinDate: 2003-02-27 12:19:23
Subject: Daily crash
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-02-27 07:30:43
Subject: Re: OIDs as keys

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Lee KindnessDate: 2003-02-27 09:08:19
Subject: Re: ecpg in REL7_3_2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-02-27 06:56:49
Subject: Re: Index File growing big.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group