Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

[PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer

From: "Magnus Naeslund\(f\)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer
Date: 2001-08-23 21:22:14
Message-ID: 04ba01c12c19$ae215870$020a0a0a@totalmef (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hello, i just reviewed the win32 errno patch and i saw that maybe i didn't
really played it totally safe in my last suggestion, the system table might
pick up the msg but not the netmsg.dll, so better try both.
I also added a hex printout of the "errno" appended to all messages, that's

If anyone hate my coding style, or that i'm using goto constructs, just tell
me, and i'll rework it into a nested if () thing.

Patch attached.


 Programmer/Networker [|] Magnus Naeslund
 PGP Key:

Attachment: win32_strerror_patch1.txt
Description: text/plain (2.2 KB)


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-08-23 21:56:51
Subject: Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? [was Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...]
Previous:From: Peter HarveyDate: 2001-08-23 21:02:16
Subject: Reverse Engineering

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rene PijlmanDate: 2001-08-23 21:37:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-08-23 20:26:31
Subject: Re: JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group