Re: moderation ok?

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: moderation ok?
Date: 2007-05-29 00:55:20
Message-ID: 04FE5721-FFFF-45BE-B546-457F12DDCB56@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On May 28, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> I wanted to check back to see if my contribution to moderation is
>> having the effect people were hoping for.
>>
>> You'll recall that the complaint was that things were not getting
>> moderated as quickly as they should. In response, Marc added me as a
>> moderator to -admin, -advocacy, -jobs, -hackers, and -bugs. Has this
>> helped?
>
> Having just received a batch of messages on -general from 5 days
> ago, I
> say your effort to keep the other lists clean has helped a great
> deal to
> prevent this from happening. Keep it up!

Posts delayed 5 days is a good thing? It sounds like maybe we need
more -general moderators... (and yes, I'm volunteering).
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-29 16:09:11 Re: Who is remus, and why is he beating up on pgfoundry.org?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-05-28 21:18:54 Re: moderation ok?