| From: | Maxime Schoemans <maxime(dot)schoemans(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Check that index can return in get_actual_variable_range() |
| Date: | 2025-10-28 13:28:30 |
| Message-ID: | 04BA29FF-7FC6-4949-B269-D8D501AF5460@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 28 Oct 2025, at 10:20, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> I have committed the first patch.
Great, thank you for looking at this.
> The test suite is probably a bit too bulky for testing this particular niche behavior. Also, it doesn't work with assertions enabled because of the hardcoded BTREE_AM_OID in src/include/access/nbtree.h. So I don't plan to commit that. But it's good to have it in the archive, and perhaps it can be part of a larger test suite for the index AM API at some point in the future.
And I agree, the test suite is probably overkill for this two-line patch, but it might be good to have around for later.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-10-28 13:33:09 | Re: Extend injection_points_attach() to accept a user-defined function |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2025-10-28 13:11:46 | Re: Batching in executor |