Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!
Date: 2017-10-18 20:00:30
Message-ID: 04952160-cca7-42d2-a8ff-3d72fce5db2d@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/18/2017 11:17 AM, Don Seiler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Vik Fearing
> <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com <mailto:vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/18/2017 05:57 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> >
> > I support the policy of using caution with regards to new versions. They
> > are often thought of as "bleeding edge" for the reason described by
> > David G Johnston. The fact that PostgreSQL 10 was only released this
> > month is critical and therefore is should not be a production server. It
> > should be used as development, or QA, at best.
>
> No, the Betas and RC should have been used in development and QA.
>
>
> I disagree with this. It isn't my company's business to test the
> Postgres software in development, as much as it would be needed and
> appreciated by the community.

Exactly.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2017-10-18 21:17:09 Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2017-10-18 19:54:54 Re: [GENERAL] huge RAM use in multi-command ALTER of table heirarchy