Re: new heapcheck contrib module (typos)

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module (typos)
Date: 2020-06-13 21:13:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-06-12 23:06, Mark Dilger wrote:

> [v7-0001-Adding-verify_heapam-and-pg_amcheck.patch]
> [v7-0002-Adding-checks-o...ations-of-hint-bit.patch]

I came across these typos in the sgml:

--exclude-scheam should be

<option>table</option> should be

I found this connection problem (or perhaps it is as designed):

$ env | grep ^PG

-- just to show that psql is connecting (via $PGPASSFILE and $PGPORT and
-- and showing a table t that I made earlier

$ psql
Timing is on.
psql (14devel_amcheck_0612_2f48)
Type "help" for help.

testdb=# \dt+ t
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Persistence | Size | Description
public | t | table | aardvark | permanent | 346 MB |
(1 row)

testdb=# \q

I think this should work:

$ pg_amcheck -i -t t
pg_amcheck: error: no matching tables were found

It seems a bug that I have to add '-d testdb':

This works OK:
pg_amcheck -i -t t -d testdb

Is that error as expected?


Erik Rijkers

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2020-06-13 22:11:42 Re: new heapcheck contrib module (typos)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-13 20:33:26 Re: Infinities in type numeric