| From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OSSP can be used in the windows environment now! |
| Date: | 2008-03-01 10:14:44 |
| Message-ID: | 045201c87b85$12d624f0$1601a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> I'd like somebody to close the loop with upstream OSSP authors first.
> If they don't see anything broken about the makefile, and indicate
> intention to incorporate it in some future release, then it's okay to
> put it in our CVS temporarily. If they don't like it then we'd better
> understand why.
>
> There's also the possibility that they put out a release including it
> next week, in which case we hardly need it in our CVS.
Um, I was hesitating the proposal by the reason which is not beautiful.
However, it turns out that it is solvable by a little working hours.
Therefore, It is due for me to do the work.I think, It is because of the
wonderfulness of PostgreSQL. But, since MinGW+GCC can already be
used, the problem is whether to provide by pginstaller. then, we have
intension necessity in it. Then, An objection will not realize it.....
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-01 21:11:12 | Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2008-03-01 01:02:33 | Re: Read-ahead and parallelism in redo recovery |