Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "elein" <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
Date: 2004-05-13 14:46:45
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FD64@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 13 May 2004 15:39
> To: David Fetter
> Cc: PostgreSQL WWW; Marc G. Fournier; Tom Lane; Josh Berkus;
> Rod Taylor; elein
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL
> Users' Group sites
>
> hey look, a dead horse, let's go beat it...

Sounds like fun...

>
> they at least have the intention of meeting in person, which
> I think is what Mark was getting at.

Well just to chuck in my tuppence worth - I agree; regional sites are
not user groups. 'User group' implies some sort of organised group of
users. A website is no more a user group than Robert's dead horse. Of
course, the group might have their own site (as might the horse), but
that not what makes them a PUG.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-05-13 14:57:24 Re: bricolage and jobs
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-05-13 14:38:36 Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites